the problem is that the government have loads of power and finnance to bad mouth the British Nationalist Party, and make sure the public only see negative stuff. the British NationalParty are the only party we have that will claim our country back and fight hard to retain our culture. they are getting my vote simply because i want my country back. i dont want my grandson living as a second class citizen in he's own country.So Cameron wants to repair the family unit and make marriage work but this is BNP policy so why steal it?
The BNP have nicked polices from the Green Party (both parties by the way are too extreme in their own right for me to vote for them) when it comes to sustainable transport. What differentiates one from the other is that one is a racist, homophobic, xenophobic party, the other is just plain daft!
Report Abuse
Not for the first time, Red, you misrepresent me. I have never denied the BNP have policies other than excluding all non-whites from UK - Hitler had some progressive economic policies, but the Holocaust kind of overshadows them.
Also, I never mentioned the word fascist - that was your word.
Report Abuse
Look if an unacceptable party has an idea which is in itself good (I take it you not not want the family structure to collapse) it has to be adopted. If your enemy adopts certain method to defeat him you have to use a similar but improved method. In this case because he adopts one or more of BNP policies it does not make him a racist or a paid up member of BNP. He is like Clown Brown the pension wrecker at an election or run up trying to get his party elected
BNP...Bengaldeshi National Party...immigration an issue....talk about calling the kettle black
Imitation, they say, is the sincerest form of flattery. Besides, go back half a century or so and you'll find that virtually all political parties claimed to support the family unit. If this is the beginning of a move back in that direction, then it is to be applauded. However, I remain yet to be convinced.
'Supporting the family' is one of those noises that politicians make that doesn't actually mean anything. So Griffin and Cameron can both bleat on about supporting the family and repairing the family unit, and we know it's meaningless. So what's the problem with Cameron spouting the same cynical rubbish that Griffin does? They're both politicians, what do you expect?
Why does Cameron and Griffin having one policy in common make Cameron a racist? Does that mean you believe that vegetarians are Jew-hating meglamaniacs, because Hitler was a veggie?
Don't get me wrong - I'm a firm believer in marriage and the family unit, and I'm happy for governments to encourage this.
But I've yet to see a single party, Labour, Conservative, Liberal or BNP come up with a coherent idea about this. In fact, isn't the BNP idea of promoting the family all about making it difficult for mothers to continue careers and penalising them for not staying at home?
The one area where Cameron is absolutely right is that the BNP are a racist party. BNP leader, Nick Griffin, famously said:
';Without the White race nothing matters [other right-wing parties] believe that the answer to the race question is integration and a futile attempt to create ';Black Britons';, while we affirm that non-Whites have no place here at all and will not rest until every last one has left our land.';
Prospective BNP voters need to ask themselves which is more likely: that Griffin has abandoned such views, or that he has chosen to hide such views behind a veneer of respectability for electoral gain.
The bnp use these kinds of jingoistic policy ideas to make you think they are anything but an extreme right-wing party who would really like to put genocide on their agenda.
Read the whole of the bnp policy, (use a dictionary if necessary) and see how similar they are to Hitler's nazi party.
The BNP are twats.
No comments:
Post a Comment